“Children’s Health Defense launched a new eBook to help parents evaluate the risks and benefits of COVID vaccines without having to rely solely on information disseminated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and mainstream media. It was published November 3rd right after I finished Covid Vaccines for Children? Part 1 post.
This eBook begins with: “”First, do no harm.” This most basic tenet of medicine was first articulated more than 2,000 years ago and has never been more important than today. At a time when we have thousands of medications, dozens of vaccines and multiple surgical options, it is more important than ever to use those options wisely for the benefit of the patient.” It is summarized below; please download it and read the whole thing.
Children and adolescents have been at the forefront of many discussions about COVID-19 — whether related to school closures, masking or experimental vaccines. In this new eBook, written from the perspective of pediatricians working on the front lines of healthcare, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) deconstructs the fear-based media coverage to underscore children’s very low risk of serious coronavirus illness and help parents make well-informed decisions.
Media’s alarmism doesn’t square with the facts
In December 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) okayed the emergency use of Pfizer’s experimental COVID vaccine for individuals age 16 and up. Against all reasonable evidence, FDA then expanded that authorization in May 2021 to younger adolescents (ages 12–15), and on Nov. 2, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) signed off on Pfizer’s vaccine for children 5 to 11 years old.
To weigh the risk of natural infection — which confers strong and long-lasting immunity — against the risk of vaccination, it is essential parents and family members arm themselves with accurate and complete information. In this comprehensive and extensively referenced eBook, CHD outlines the following:
- The vast majority of children and adolescents who experience COVID illness have mild or no symptoms and uneventful outcomes. The estimated survival rate for children under age 17 is 99.998%.
- Effective and inexpensive preventive measures and treatments for COVID are available including inexpensive therapies like vitamins C and D, zinc, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
- Health officials are ignoring many measures to strengthen children’s innate immune system—the non-specific immunity that makes kids able to cope with a wide variety of health challenges.
- The fallout from lockdowns, masking and other restrictions have taken a far greater toll on children’s physical and mental health than COVID. Negative impacts include:
- increased reliance on processed foods
- decreased exercise and time outdoors
- loss of interactive play, social isolation
- overuse of carcinogenic sanitizers
- developmentally inappropriate online education
- increased mental health problems (including an uptick in young suicides)
- social and emotional stunting from mask-wearing.
- “Positive” PCR test results for COVID mean little — most are false positives.
- It is crucial for parents to understand children’s very low SARS-CoV-2 risk when they evaluate the risks of COVID-19 vaccines not subjected to long-term safety studies. In the Pfizer clinical trial with 12–15-year-olds, harms outweighed potential benefits.
- The novel technologies in COVID vaccines, including synthetic spike proteins and lipid nanoparticles that can cross the blood-brain barrier, introduce new layers of complexity and many more opportunities for something to go wrong.
- The mRNA vaccine clinical trials showed less than a 1% decrease in the absolute risk of getting COVID, also showing that between 88 and 142 kids would need to be vaccinated to theoretically prevent one case of COVID.
- Vaccine makers’ assumption that cells will make just enough spike protein for vaccine recipients to develop adequate antibodies but not enough to cause harm is not borne out by the evidence. The synthetic spike proteins triggered into production by COVID vaccines may “prime the immune system toward development of both auto-inflammatory and autoimmune disease,” both in the short- and long-term.
- Rat studies show that the lipid nanoparticles in the mRNA injections penetrate the blood-brain barrier within 15 minutes; vaccine spike protein circulates in blood for at least two weeks, accumulating in the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenals and ovaries.
- Experimental COVID shots have caused healthy adolescents to die or experience serious, life-changing adverse reactions, including blood clots, heart problems, extreme fatigue and menstrual irregularities. Outcomes such as myocarditis are changing the trajectory of some young people’s lives.
- COVID vaccines also pose potential long-term risks for healthy young people, including possible effects on fertility. Four out of five pregnant women (82%) in one CDC study experienced pregnancy loss after receiving COVID injections in the first or second trimesters.
- When a disease poses very little risk to a healthy young person, the safety profile of a recommended vaccine must be exemplary, but this is not the case with COVID vaccines. For young people, harms from experimental COVID vaccines clearly outweigh potential benefits.
- It is unethical for companies and officials to ask children and adolescents to incur health risks to “protect the elderly and infirm,” especially with unknown long-term risks. Even a small risk is not worth taking if the potential consequences include serious or fatal short-term outcomes or life-long health and financial consequences.
- Children and adolescents, with vanishingly small risks of death or disability from COVID-19, should be allowed to go to school, socialize with peers, play in the dirt and contribute to herd immunity through natural infection. Childhood exposure to coronaviruses is likely to induce strong and long-lasting immunity that, in turn, is likely to protect children from serious problems from COVID-19.
The COVID crisis has exposed the dangers of pronouncements on high from public health officials. As this eBook tries to show, one-size-fits-all public health measures are illogical, ineffective and harmful. Our children deserve far better.”
I initially started this blog because of my concern for how it was affecting children in negative ways. As the months turned into years, I wanted to share the knowledge I have gained to help parents navigate away from fear and to share information that is not being shared on the mainstream media. I believe this eBook is the ultimate in gathering comprehensive and extensively referenced information – and I thank the Children’s Defense Fund for putting it together. I believe that it is worth your time to digest it before deciding whether to give your children the Covid shots.
By Dr. Robert Malone, (December 13, 2021) The risk/benefit analysis is not even close with this vaccine for children.
My name is Robert Malone. I am a physician and a scientist. But more importantly, I am a father and a grandfather. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.
I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I’m generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases.
Before you inject your child – a decision that is irreversible – I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created.
There are three main issues that parents need to understand before they take this irrevocable decision:
The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs. These organs include:
- Their brain and nervous system
- Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots
- Their reproductive system
- And most importantly, this vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system
The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable, they cannot be reversed.
- You can’t fix the lesions within their brains
- You cannot repair heart tissue scarring
- You cannot repair a genetically reset immune system
- And this vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family
The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.
- We need at least 5 years of testing and research before we can really understand the risks associated with this new technology
- The harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later
- I ask you to ask yourself as a fellow parent if you want your own child to be part of the most radical experiment in human history
One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie.
- Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents
- It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease
Finally, in summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of your lives.
The risk/benefit analysis is not even close with this vaccine for children.
As a parent and grandparent, my strong recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.
TrialSite News, Mary Beth Pfeiffer; November 8, 2021
“Leading experts on flawed U.S. COVID policy issued an urgent warning at a summit Saturday: Young children will be harmed in an ill-advised rush to vaccinate a population with very little chance of severe infection from the virus.”
“The real risk for healthy kids is about zero — it does appear to be lower than the flu,” said Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology on which the vaccine is based. Inoculating 28 million children 5 to 11 years old, Malone told attendees of the Florida Summit on Covid, could lead to “a thousand or more excess deaths.”
“That’s a thousand kids,” he told the audience of 800 doctors, nurses and advocates. “It’s a thousand kids too many.”
Please read the entire article.
13,000 physicians and medical scientists recently published the Rome Covid Declaration, to alert citizens to the deadly consequences of disrupting life-saving treatment and suppressing open scientific discussion. Follow the link above to see some of the names of the qualified doctors and scientists who were co-signers of the declaration.
WE, THE PHYSICIANS OF THE WORLD, united and loyal to the Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the imminent threat to humanity brought forth by current Covid-19 policies, are compelled to declare the following:
WHEREAS, after 20 months of research, millions of patients treated, hundreds of clinical trials performed and scientific data shared, we have demonstrated and documented our success and understanding in combating COVID-19;
WHEREAS, in considering the risks vs. benefits of major policy decisions, thousands of physicians and medical scientists worldwide have reached consensus on three foundational principles (see two & three at links);
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT HEALTHY CHILDREN SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO FORCED VACCINATION (view supporting evidence)
Negligible clinical risks from SARS-CoV-2 infection exist for healthy children under eighteen.
Long term safety of the current COVID vaccines in children cannot be determined prior to instituting such policies. Without high-powered, reproducible, long term safety data, risks to the long-term health status of children remain too high to support use in healthy children.
Children risk severe, adverse events from receiving the vaccine. Permanent physical damage to the brain, heart, immune and reproductive system associated with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-based genetic vaccines has been demonstrated in children.
Healthy, unvaccinated children are critical to achieving herd immunity. Natural immunity is proven to tolerate infection, benefiting community protection while there is insufficient data to assess whether Covid vaccines assist herd immunity.
by Annette Huenke | Nov 11, 2021 | Port Townsend Free Press
. . . In the article “Pfizer COVID Vaccine Fails Risk-Benefit Analysis in Children 5 to 11,” Toby Rogers, PhD, explains the critical metric NNTV—it’s the “number needed to vaccinate” in order to prevent a single case, hospitalization, ICU admission or death. The best study to date determined that:
“…the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9,000 and 100,000 (95% confidence interval)… injecting all 28,384,878 children ages 5 to 11 with two doses of Pfizer . . . would save, at most, 45 lives… So then the NNTV to prevent a single fatality in this age group is 28,384,878 / 45 = 630,775. But it’s a two-dose regimen, so if one wants to calculate the NNTV per injection the number doubles to 1,261,550. It’s literally the worst NNTV in the history of vaccination.”
”Kirsch, Rose, and Crawford (2021) estimate the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System undercounts fatal reactions by a factor of 41, which would put the total fatal side effects in this age-range at 5,248. Kirsch et al. represent a conservative estimate because others have put the underreporting factor at 100… Simply put, the Biden administration plan would kill 5,248 children via Pfizer mRNA shots in order to save 45 children from dying of coronavirus.“
Why are we vaccinating children?
It was predicted by many that the highly profitable injections would eventually be aimed at the children, regardless of this age group’s negligibly low risk of severe or fatal outcomes, and despite the low transmission rates in schools and from the young to the old in household settings. With an eye on profit alone, career criminal outfit Pfizer sought EUA approval from the FDA for use of its mRNA jabs for this young cohort. On October 26th, the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) supported Pfizer’s pitch, voting 17-0 (1 abstention). Most of the committee have histories of deep commercial bonds with industry; eleven of them were “temporary” members. Committee member and apparent psychopath Dr. Eric Rubin, an infectious disease physician and editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, said without a trace of irony,
“We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines.”
Risks of myocarditis and pericarditis were acknowledged, but ultimately discounted. By the drug company’s own admission, the trial population size “was too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination.” The safety data provided by Pfizer showed that the two study cohort groups were followed for a ridiculously short period of time—one for just two months, the other just two-and-a-half weeks. Throwing caution to the winds, they are experimenting on our children.
Aaron Siri, lead attorney at Siri & Glimstad, has won multiple lawsuits against Health and Human Services and its subordinate agencies. On behalf of the Informed Choice Action Network (ICAN), his firm is enlisting the aid of Congress members who care about civil liberties. He writes:
“The legal authority for the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to issue an EUA for children for this product is lacking, including because there is no medical emergency for children and the vaccinated still become infected with and transmit the virus. (Infra § I.) It is also improper to issue an EUA for children when the data does not demonstrate that the known benefits outweigh the known risks, the trial was underpowered, and there are serious concerns regarding how they were conducted. (Infra § II.) The foregoing issues are compounded by the fact that federal health authorities have given financial immunity to Pfizer for injuries caused by this product, including if it engages in willful misconduct, despite a history of such conduct by Pfizer. (Infra § III.)”
There’s one more important fact that mainstream media isn’t reporting. On page 14 of the FDA fact sheet, it says “To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride.” Tromethamine is a blood acid reducer often used to stabilize people with heart attacks. Curiously, less than 5 months ago, the FDA approved Pradaxa, “the first oral blood thinning medication for children.”
Think they’re anticipating problems? Pradaxa is for patient populations “3 months to less than 12 years old with venous thromboembolism (a condition where blood clots form in the veins).” The press release casually adds, “The most common side effects of Pradaxa include digestive system symptoms and bleeding. Pradaxa can cause serious and fatal bleeding.”
News site Axios reported on Nov. 2nd that Pfizer’s jab “has quickly become the highest-selling drug in the world” adding that the pharma behemoth “forecasts revenue from the COVID-19 vaccine it developed with BioNTech will now reach $36 billion this year, up 7.5% from its previous estimate of $33.5 billion.” The billions that would surely be paid out in civil courts for injuries and death from these therapies is being funneled directly into undue influence of the media, academia and clinical research. Market analyst site statista says “Pfizer spent around 11.6 billion U.S. dollars on selling, informational and administrative expenses in 2020.” Advertising is included in that budget.
Maddie De Garay, now 13, was severely injured after receiving the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine as a trial participant. The Vaccine Safety Research Association created a 30-second ad highlighting Maddie’s adverse events—severe damage Pfizer denied for months, eventually reporting to the FDA that she had a “stomach ache”—in advance of the VRBPAC meeting. Comcast initially agreed to broadcast the advert during episodes of “Saturday Night Live” and “Meet the Press.” The day before it was scheduled to air, Comcast officials pulled it. Click to watch what Comcast censored.
Normalizing the abnormal
In the “new normal” characterized by inversion, life as we understood it no longer applies. “Vaccines” that are not really vaccines are “safe and effective” even though they cause injury and death and do not prevent transmission, infection, hospitalization or death. Influenza, the seasonal respiratory illness that typically kills over half a million people a year, magically disappears for 18 months, but now we’re told by these Svengalis that it will definitely return this winter. Anaphylaxis, arrhythmia and fainting are commonplace. Top athletes regularly drop dead on the field, school mates die in zoom classes and strokes are to be expected in kids.
Where are the adults in the room?
. . .“We could see that this experimental gene therapy would be pushed on our children in an environment where other adults can influence or pressure kids into major medical decisions without the consent of a parent. It was a very difficult decision to homeschool our children, but now that we are doing it, our kids are thriving and we all wish that we had started doing it years ago. It feels like a weight has been lifted. Every day that they would come home from school over the last couple years, they were stressed and there was hardly any joy left in what should be a happy childhood.”. . .
Truthful information about vaccine risks like those Maddie experienced is censored, while pharma’s control of the global narrative is absolute. . . .our health department repeats Pfizer’s insidious “Superhero” messaging to manipulate and brainwash our kids, with local schools marching in lockstep.
. . . If the last two years have taught us anything, we must expect that these draconian measures will soon be applied to the five to eleven-year-olds. Homeschooling is sounding better by the day. This Yale epidemiologist agrees—I’d Pull a Healthy Kid From School Before Giving Them the COVID Vaccine.
“It is incredibly difficult to fathom the depth of what’s behind the stated intention of governments to inject every human on the planet with experimental gene therapies developed in response to COVID-19. Even more puzzling is that normally thoughtful people are allowing themselves and their children to be coerced into taking experimental high-risk injections.”
. . . “COVID measures and COVID-19 injections have harmed and killed hundreds of thousands of people – while the COVID ‘pandemic’ hasn’t resulted in significantly more deaths than those of recent years. The illusion that our government, public health, and the conventional medical system have our best interests at heart has been smashed beyond all repair. . .”
“This callous disregard for risk . . . is particularly evident in recent government announcements to make the experimental COVID-19 injections available to children ages 5 – 11 years, which will be in addition to an already bulging-at-the-seams childhood vaccination schedule. On that schedule, Canada’s children receive 68 or 70 doses of 16 or 17 vaccines by age 18, depending on province/territory. If you are 35 years of age or older, you’ve received fewer vaccines in your life than a six-month old baby today.”
“Covid survival rate for all ages is ~99.85%.The overall survival rate of minors (under the age of 19 years) with COVID-19 is 99.997%. It has been established that children do not contribute to the transmission of COVID illness. Despite this, governments are now accepting registration for children ages 5 – 11 years, seemingly oblivious to the extreme risk and zero benefit of the shots, . . . COVID-19 shot trials are underway on six-month-old babies. This targeted marketing of our children will add significantly to the billions of dollars in profits for the liability-free pharmaceutical industry.”